Siegal v. New York Title & Mortgage Co.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. The finding that the appellant New York Title and Mortgage Company knew that the defendant Isidor Glasgal held the mortgage in question as collateral security and that the real owner was the plaintiff is contrary to the evidence. There is no proof whatsoever supporting the findings that the plaintiff has been damaged in the sum of $14,000 or in any sum. The relief granted against defendant Nash Gordon, an innocent purchaser for value, is not only unsupported by a finding, but is improper for the reason that as to him the complaint was dismissed upon the trial with the plaintiff’s consent. Thereafter he took no part either upon the trial or upon this appeal. In view of the disposition of this ease, the appeal by the New
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.