Goldstein v. Schick
Goldstein v. Schick
237 A.D. 905
Opinion of the Court
Order denying motion to amend final judgment by eliminating the direction that defendants pay a certain amount of money into court reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The amendment sought by defendants related to an error of form and not to a matter of substance. It was, therefore, proper to amend and not to appeal from the judgment. (Simmons v. Craig, 137 N. Y. 550.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.