Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933

Midtown Bank of New York v. National Surety Co.

Midtown Bank of New York v. National Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 24, 1933
238 A.D. 145; 263 N.Y.S. 120; 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9442

Counsel

C. Arthur Levy, for the appellant., Samuel N. Leiterman of counsel [Arnold E. Feldman with him on the brief; Sherman & Goldring, attorneys], for the respondent.

Midtown Bank of New York v. National Surety Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The cause of action allowed to be pleaded by way of amendment of the complaint is on an instrument which contains a distinct and separate liability of defendant from that which is alleged in the original complaint.

We think this may not be permitted and that the order of resettlement is incorrect and should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to resettle the said order entered on November 10, 1932, denied, with ten dollars costs.

Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin and O'Malley, JJ., concur; Townley, J., dissents.

Order entered November 25, 1932, so far as appealed from, reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to resettle order entered on November 10, 1932, denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.