Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933

Caspary v. Bardong

Caspary v. Bardong
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1933
239 A.D. 849
Caspary v. Bardong

Opinion of the Court

Amended order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, with costs. The motion papers fail to show that any effort was made, prior to the trial, to ascertain where plaintiff was employed. The so-called newly-discovered evidence was available long before the trial and could have been obtained by the exercise of reasonable diligence. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.