Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo
Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo
239 A.D. 867
Opinion of the Court
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. (See Fish v. Rutland Railroad Co., 209 App. Div. 303; stipulation by employer and carrier’s attorney.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents and votes to reverse award and to remit claim to the Board.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.