Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933

Sperling v. Inecto, Inc.

Sperling v. Inecto, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1933
240 A.D. 717
Sperling v. Inecto, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

On reargument, the resettled order denying motion to vacate notice to examine defendant before trial, but *718limiting the examination to four of the items contained, in the notice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. It not appearing that the proof required on the trial cannot be obtained otherwise, the examination of defendant is not necessary beyond the four items allowed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.