In re the Estate of Rosenblath
In re the Estate of Rosenblath
240 A.D. 846
Opinion of the Court
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Ulman, 238 App. Div. 864; Edson v. Parsons, 155 N. Y. 555; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 id. 28; Hermann v. Ludwig, 186 App. Div. 287.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ. [146 Misc. 424.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.