Pia Holding Co. v. Applefield
Pia Holding Co. v. Applefield
237 A.D. 912
Opinion of the Court
Order denying appellants’ motion to vacate order appointing receiver reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon authority of Brooklyn Empire Construction Company, Inc., v. Cinak Realty Corp. (226 App. Div. 809) and cases cited. Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., not voting.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.