Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Peiffer v. Ewing

Peiffer v. Ewing
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 10, 1934
240 A.D. 283; 268 N.Y.S. 704; 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10631

Counsel

James A. Dilkes, for the appellant., O. A. Ottaway, for the respondent.

Peiffer v. Ewing

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order of filiation appealed from is dated October 3, 1932. Thereafter defendant entered into an agreement of compromise or settlement which the court approved in an order dated February 2, 1933. The latter order recites that all parties consented to such settlement. While the compromise agreement is not printed in the record, the order must be deemed to embody its purport, and defendant has not appealed from this latter order. Defendant cannot, by this appeal, be heard to ask relief from that to which he has assented.

All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.