Stofsky v. Seigler

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence on the question of damages in favor of Pauline Stofsky, the amount allowed being inadequate, and on the ground that the verdict for defendants against the plaintiff husband is inconsistent with the verdict in favor of the wife, Pauline Stofsky. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Qarswell and Davis, JJ., concur.