Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Groggins v. Daily Mirror, Inc.

Groggins v. Daily Mirror, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 1934
241 A.D. 818
Groggins v. Daily Mirror, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The second cause of action is insufficient in law. (Kimmerle v. New York Evening Journal, 262 N. Y. 99, 102; Sydney v. MacFadden Newspaper Pub. Corp., 242 id. 208, 214; Wellman v. Sun Printing & Pub. Assn., 66 Hun, 331, 344.) According to-the allegations of the complaint, the article does not touch the reputation of the lawyer in his profession, and is not otherwise libelous per se as to him. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.