Goldstein v. Friedland
Goldstein v. Friedland
241 A.D. 829
Opinion of the Court
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to open plaintiff’s default, to vacate order dismissing his complaint and to restore the case to the Trial Term calendar denied, with ten dollars costs. The granting of this motion was an abuse of discretion. The delay in bringing this case to trial is inexcusable. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.