Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Gundersen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Gundersen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1934
241 A.D. 873
Gundersen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Opinion of the Court

Order denying motion to resettle case on appeal affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. This court may not disturb the rulings of the trial judge in settling a case where an issue of fact arises as to whether an incident did or did not take place on a trial or an exception was or was not taken on a trial. In Zimmer v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (28 App. Div. 504) there was no issue of fact arising as a result of conflicting contentions or affidavits. The lack of an exception will not disable this court from doing justice where a prejudicial ruling was made on an objection taken to an incident or a question. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.