Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Nelkin v. Provident Loan Society

Nelkin v. Provident Loan Society
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1934
241 A.D. 875
Nelkin v. Provident Loan Society

Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff, without costs, upon agreed statement of facts. The facts in paragraph 10 of the submission may not be considered. (Green v. Wachs, 254 N. Y. 437.) The memorandum did not constitute Moskowitz an agent of the plaintiff for the sale of the ring (Green v. Wachs, supra), and, therefore, the Factors’ Act does not apply. (Pers. Prop. Law, § 43.) The ring having been obtained by Moskowitz from the plaintiff through a common-law larceny “ by trick and device ” for this added reason the Factors’ Act does not apply. (Stone, Inc., v. Provident Loan Society of New York, 260 N. Y. 536; Soltau v. Gerdau, 119 id. 380; Schmidt v. Simpson, 204 id. 434, 439.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.