Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Bourak Contracting Co. v. Dayton

Bourak Contracting Co. v. Dayton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1934
242 A.D. 649; 272 N.Y.S. 432
Bourak Contracting Co. v. Dayton

Opinion of the Court

Order modified by striking therefrom all provisions settling or referring to the defendant’s account and all requirements as to notice to the persons therein *650named, and also by striking therefrom the provisions construing the agreement of agency, and, as so modified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. In our opinion the provisions of the order settling the defendant’s account and requiring notice to the persons therein named and also construing the agency agreement were manifestly improper. No such relief can be awarded to the defendant except after a trial and pursuant to a judgment. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.