Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Hirshowitz v. Bialey

Hirshowitz v. Bialey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 15, 1934
242 A.D. 780
Hirshowitz v. Bialey

Opinion of the Court

Order of the County Court of Westchester county denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment modified so as to grant plaintiff leave to renew his motion, if so advised, after having -obtained a 'bill of particulars of the defendant’s separate defense which shall disclose the name of plaintiff’s alleged agent, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the denial of plaintiff’s *781motion on the present record was proper, but, in view of defendant’s failure to disclose the name of the alleged agent, plaintiff should be allowed to renew the motion after obtaining a bill of particulars giving this information. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.