Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Arduini v. Banco di Napoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 14, 1934

243 A.D. 10; 276 N.Y.S. 90; 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472

Counsel

Albert B. Connelly of counsel [Cravath, de Gersdorff, Swaine & Wood, attorneys], for the appellant., Charles G. Coster of counsel [A. Ralph D'Andrea with him on the brief; A. Ralph D’Andrea, attorney], for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The Surrogate’s Court has no jurisdiction to direct payment of a debt by summary order. (Matter of Brazil, 219 App. Div. 594; Matter of Thomas, 235 id. 450; Id. 455; Matter of Hammer, 237 id. 497.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.