Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Axinn & Sons Lumber Co. v. Osinski

Axinn & Sons Lumber Co. v. Osinski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1934
243 A.D. 559
Axinn & Sons Lumber Co. v. Osinski

Opinion of the Court

Order denying the motion by the judgment debtor to direct the judgment creditor or its attorney to file the examination had in supplementary proceedings reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Where an examination has been had of a judgment debtor pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§§ 773 or 773-a), the order and examination must be filed with the county clerk. (Renner v. Meyer, 22 Abb. N. C. 438; Fiske v. Twigg, 5 Civ. Pro. 41; Matter of Falkenburg, 19 Misc. 418; Sinnott v. First National Bank, 34 App. Div. 161.) The fact that the proceedings are instituted by the additional or alternative remedy by subpoena (§ 773-a) does not change the rule laid down in the cases cited. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.