Heinzen v. Bell

Plaintiff was struck by an automobile; he suffered injury to his hip and to his elbow. The extent of these injuries was in sharp conflict between the doctors. The doctor who examined him immediately after the accident and the following day found mere abrasions and superficial injuries. There was a question of fact for the jury as to the extent of these injuries. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.