In re Kempf
In re Kempf
243 A.D. 855
Opinion of the Court
Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order is merely an intermediate ruling as to the procedure upon a trial or hearing and is not an “ order affecting a substantial right.” We do not pass upon the question as to which party has the burden of proof or as to whether the condition is a precedent or subsequent one. All concur. (The order denied a motion to dismiss the petition and directed the executor to assume the burden of proof.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.