Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935

Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. Atwell

Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. Atwell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 29, 1935
246 A.D. 137; 283 N.Y.S. 510; 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8686

Counsel

Selig Edelman [Sidney J. Liftin with him on the brief], appellant in person., William J. Butler of counsel [David Asch with him on the brief], for the plaintiff-respondent., Robert Daru of counsel [Maurice Hellman with him on the brief], for the defendant-respondent.

Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. Atwell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

While the court has limited power to review the judgment exercised by the Superintendent of Banks, it may, in a proper case, disapprove of his acts. (Matter of Broderick, 235 App. Div. 281.) Here the Superintendent did not exceed his authority or abuse the discretion vested in him.

It follows, therefore, that the order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Order granting motion of the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, as liquidator, on behalf of plaintiff, to compromise action and settle the claim set forth in the complaint for the sum of $32,500 and to fix the lien of appellant at ten per cent of the said sum of $32,500 to be received in settlement, to wit, the sum of $3,250, together with $30.15 for legal .disbursements, and for other relief, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.