Seidel v. Hollander
Seidel v. Hollander
246 A.D. 233; 285 N.Y.S. 233; 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9471
Opinion of the Court
Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiff’s responsibility for the merchandise ceased upon shipment in this country, the defendant is nevertheless entitled to establish the condition of the merchandise on arrival in Europe, for the reason that such proof, if properly connected, will constitute some evidence of the condition of the merchandise at the time of shipment.
Present—Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.