Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936

Seidel v. Hollander

Seidel v. Hollander
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 7, 1936
246 A.D. 233; 285 N.Y.S. 233; 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9471

Counsel

Morris Rappaport, for the appellant., I. Arnold Himber, for the respondent.

Seidel v. Hollander

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiff’s responsibility for the merchandise ceased upon shipment in this country, the defendant is nevertheless entitled to establish the condition of the merchandise on arrival in Europe, for the reason that such proof, if properly connected, will constitute some evidence of the condition of the merchandise at the time of shipment.

*234The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present—Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.