Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936

Marcus v. Manhattan Beach Parks Corp.

Marcus v. Manhattan Beach Parks Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 24, 1936
246 A.D. 331; 284 N.Y.S. 952; 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9494

Counsel

Benjamin Cohen of counsel [Herman S. Stern, attorney], for the appellant., Edward A. Harmon of counsel [William E. Lowther, attorney], for the respondent.

Marcus v. Manhattan Beach Parks Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

From the plaintiff’s proof and the photographs in evidence, the jury could have found that the defect which caused the plaintiff’s fall was the result of gradual wear or deterioration and that consequently the defendant was chargeable with constructive notice of the condition.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Dore, J., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.