Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.
Opinion of the Court
The action is for a balance of unpaid wages. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a director of sales of street car advertising. His compensation was to be at the rate of $1,250 a month. From February 1, 1933, to July 31, 1934, that is, for a period of eighteen months, the plaintiff received a total of $13,750. He should have received during that period the sum of $22,500. The unpaid amount, to wit, $8,750, is the amount awarded to him by the verdict of the jury.
We think the jury’s finding that there was no disloyalty in the receipt of the moneys paid to plaintiff, that no business or profit was deflected from defendant corporation, and that with knowledge of the practice on the part of an executive officer (the vice-president), the plaintiff was continued in defendant’s employ without payment of his full wages during a period of seven months, is supported by the testimony. The issues were properly decided by the jury and the verdict should not have been disturbed.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, the verdict reinstated, and judgment thereon directed to be entered for plaintiff for $8,750, with interest and costs.
Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, with costs, the verdict reinstated, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff for $8,750, with interest and costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.