Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936

In re Kavesh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 25, 1936

247 A.D. 175; 286 N.Y.S. 590; 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8209

Counsel

James Lipsig, for the appellant Socialist Party “ Opposition Group.”, Seymour B. Quel of counsel [Paxton Blair and Russell Lord Tar-box with him on the brief; Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel], for the appellant Board of Elections of the City of New- York., Matthew M. Levy of counsel [David Halper, Samuel Bobrowsky and Sidney Markowitz with him on the brief], for the petitioner-respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The failure to comply with section 142 of the Election Law by petitioner-respondent in filing objections and proper specifications to the designating petitions, in so far as such objections appear on the face of the petition, precludes a review *176because of such failure of compliance. The record does not contain any proof upon which the court in the exercise of its summary jurisdiction might find the designating petitions defective.

On the state of the record, the order should be reversed in so far as appealed from and the petition denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from unanimously reversed and petition denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.