Cochran v. Taylor
Cochran v. Taylor
248 A.D. 669
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 N. Y. 517; Baird v. Baird, 145 id. 659; Hocking Valley R. Co. v. Barbour, 192 App. Div. 654; Strobe v. Netherland Co., 245 id. 573.) All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Fuller v. Artman (69 Hun, 546). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action by assignee of an option to compel sale of oil property.) Present—Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [156 Misc. 750.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.