Murray v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Murray v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
249 A.D. 826; 293 N.Y.S. 415
Opinion of the Court
In an action by plaintiff, a customer of defendant, a storekeeper, to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall on the floor of the store, alleged to have been caused by its slippery and dangerous condition owing to spinach leaves thereon, judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Johnston and Taylor, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and the dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.