Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937

Claim of Casey v. Howard

Claim of Casey v. Howard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 17, 1937
250 A.D. 807; 294 N.Y.S. 332; 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9073
Claim of Casey v. Howard

Opinion of the Court

Appeal raised the question of coverage. Claimant, an employee of John Howard, was injured while his employer was engaged, pursuant to a subcontract with the general contractors, in fitting a pipe into a hot-water house-heating boiler. The subcontractor carried no workmen’s compensation insurance. The general contractors’ compensation policy covered “ plumbing — gas, steam, hot water or other pipe fitting,” etc. The policy also had attached a rider carrying into the contract the provisions of section 56 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, as to the liability of the general contractor, whose contract includes a hazardous employment, for injuries of the employees of a subcontractor. (See Matter of Passarelli v. Columbia E. & C. Co., 270 N. Y. 68.) The carrier of the general contractor is liable for the award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to *808the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.