Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937

In re Vogel

In re Vogel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 28, 1937
251 A.D. 257; 296 N.Y.S. 297; 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6905

Counsel

S. C. Lewis of counsel [Einar Chrystie, attorney], for the petitioner., Respondent in person.

In re Vogel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The respondent has been shown to have been guilty of sharp practice as an attorney, of dishonorable conduct in several matters, especially in evading his obligation to pay for a chattel purchased under a contract of conditional sale, and of giving false testimony in connection therewith in supplementary proceedings. He should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.