Ranalli v. Breed

In an action for malpractice, the facts of which had not been discovered until the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prae. Act, § 50) had run, order and the judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Tulloch v. Haselo (218 App. Div. 313) and Conklin v. Draper (229 id. 227; afld., 254 N. Y. 620). Present—■ Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.