Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937

In re Flax

In re Flax
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 29, 1937
252 A.D. 279; 299 N.Y.S. 113; 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5633

Counsel

John Vance Hewitt of counsel [Einar Chrystie, attorney], for the petitioner., John Winans, for the respondent.

In re Flax

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record discloses that an effort was made on behalf of the respondent to solicit the case of one Hiram Anulis, who sustained injuries when the motorcycle he was operating collided with an automobile driven by one Charles Horton. Because of respondent’s unethical conduct in this matter he is suspended from the bar for a period of one year, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.