In re Vogel
Opinion of the Court
The respondent was retained to vacate a stipulation settling an action against his client. The motion to vacate was made and granted and leave given to file an answer upon condition the defendant deposit with the clerk of the court the sum of $130 with interest within five days after service of the order. Respondent’s client was unable to provide the money within that time. The respondent stated he would endeavor to obtain an extension of time. He moved for and was granted such extension, thereafter receiving from his client $245.70 to be deposited with the clerk of the court. This amount he converted to his own use, falsely representing to his client that the money had been deposited with the clerk of the court and thereafter by false statements endeavored to conceal the true situation. He permitted an order punishing his client for contempt to be entered by default and
There are no mitigating circumstances in this case.
The respondent should be disbarred.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Respondent disbarred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.