Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938

Seligmann v. Seligmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 4, 1938

255 A.D. 277; 7 N.Y.S.2d 428; 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4715

Counsel

Howard F. R. Mulligan of counsel [Herman N. Schwartz with him on the brief and Edward A. Robertson, attorneys], for the appellant., Emanuel B. Cohen, for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The complaint is insufficient in that it does not specify the nature and circumstances of defendant’s misconduct, or set forth the time and place of the acts complained of. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 280.) Furthermore, the affidavits fail to show the probability of plaintiff’s success at the trial, or the necessity at present of an allowance for support pendente lite.

The order should be reversed and the motion for alimony and counsel fee denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed and motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.