Hammons v. General Railway Signal Co.
Opinion of the Court
On defendant’s motion, under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the Special Term dismissed the complaint on the ground that the pleadings and bills of particulars indicate that the defense of the six-year Statute of Limitations was sustained; and further held that as section 59 of the Civil Practice Act was applicable written evidence of the agreement on January 6, 1930, was required, and its absence was fatal.
A reading of the complaint and the bills of particulars indicates that plaintiff is suing not upon the contract of October 7, 1929, but upon a different contract made January 6, 1930. That contract, as alleged, is an agreement under the terms of which defendant (1) gave plaintiff an option to purchase 4,000 shares of defendant’s
The order and judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order and judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.