Murray v. Neal
Murray v. Neal
256 A.D. 888; 9 N.Y.S.2d 101; 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5245
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find no errors of law or fact in this case. Claims such as plaintiff’s are always subject to the closest scrutiny, but, from the whole record, we gain the impression that the plaintiff made out a meritorious case and that the award was reasonable in amount. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff on a claim against an estate for care furnished decedent.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.