Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939

Sprague v. Buell

Sprague v. Buell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 11, 1939
256 A.D. 893; 9 N.Y.S.2d 87; 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272
Sprague v. Buell

Opinion of the Court

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The evidence presented questions of fact. The testimony offered by the defendant was neither incredible nor insufficient as a matter of law. Under these circumstances the finding of the jury is conclusive. (Meyers v. Hines, 199 App. Div. 594, 596.) We find no reversible error either in the submission of the case to the jury or in the denial of the motions for new trials on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. One order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes, and the other order denies a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.