Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939

In re Ticho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 27, 1939

257 A.D. 622; 14 N.Y.S.2d 943; 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7827

Counsel

S. C. Lewis of counsel [Einar Chrystie, attorney], for the petitioner., Respondent in person.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The respondent is censured for so negligently conducting the affairs of his office that funds collected for a client *623were commingled with his own and not remitted until after the matter had been called to his attention by the petitioner’s grievance committee.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.