Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939

Curtin v. Hirshfield

Curtin v. Hirshfield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 5, 1939
257 A.D. 964; 14 N.Y.S.2d 143; 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8715
Curtin v. Hirshfield

Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover on an account stated, order granting defendant’s motion to examine plaintiff before trial and denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The record presents the frail issue of fact of whether the plaintiff agreed that the amount awarded by the city of New York, less an advance thereon made by defendant, would be accepted in full satisfaction of the claim, which issue requires a trial. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.