Chace v. Liepshutz

In 1934 a judgment for $1,474.07 in an action upon a promissory note was recovered by plaintiff against appellant Harold Liepshutz and his father, Samuel Liepshutz. This appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment upon the ground that process was not served upon appellant. The proof before the Special Term indicated that service was made. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.