Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940

Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.

Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 19, 1940
258 A.D. 1070; 18 N.Y.S.2d 744; 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8940
Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 985.] The following questions are certified: 1. Should the motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint have been granted on the ground that plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law? 2. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? In the event that the decision of the Court of Appeals be adverse to defendant its time to answer is extended *1071until twenty days after the determination by the Court of Appeals. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.