In re the Estate of Carmichael
In re the Estate of Carmichael
259 A.D. 970; 19 N.Y.S.2d 845; 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7472
Opinion of the Court
Decree affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate. Memorandum: From the fact that Waddell Carmichael married the mother of petitioner before petitioner was bom a presumption arises that he was the father of petitioner (Matter of Lentz, 247 App. Div. 31, 34); but beyond that the record amply supports the finding that he was in fact the petitioner’s father, and that petitioner is the only heir of decedent. All concur. (The decree adjudges petitioner to be the sole heir and next of kin and distributee of decedent, in a proceeding to establish inheritance rights.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.