Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940

Fusco v. Ciaramella

Fusco v. Ciaramella
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 4, 1940
260 A.D. 925; 23 N.Y.S.2d 24; 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5486
Fusco v. Ciaramella

Opinion of the Court

Action to foreclose a second mortgage on real property. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, to the extent of striking out the answer of appellants Anthony Ciaramella and Felicia Ciaramella as sham, with leave to plaintiff, within ten days from the entry of the order hereon, to serve a reply to the counterclaims, alleging as a defense the same facts as were urged by him in *926support of the motion. In our opinion the claimed defenses of plaintiff to the counterclaims should be pleaded and the issues then determined upon a trial, rather than summarily. Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.