In re Queens County Bar Ass'n in Respect of Levine
Opinion of the Court
■ Respondent was admitted to the practice of the law in November, 1931. It is charged against him that after the entry of a judgment on September 1, 1937, against one Perlman, the latter gave respondent $100 on September 21, 1938, for the specific purpose of paying the balance due on a settlement of the judgment, and that respondent failed to pay the same to the judgment creditor, except $35 thereof. Respondent claimed that the $100 represented a loan by Perlman to him and was not, as claimed by Perlman, to be used for the purpose of disposing of the judgment. The learned official referee has found against respondent’s contention. During the course of the hearing it appeared that although respondent represented the judgment creditor in an endeavor to collect the amount of the judgment from Perlman, he at the same time represented
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.