London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis
London Character Shoe Corp. v. Davis
263 A.D. 865; 32 N.Y.S.2d 793; 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 693; 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7091
Opinion of the Court
The injunction is upheld because Special Term was justified in finding that the sole objective of defendants’ picketing was to coerce plaintiffs into interfering in the matter of a dispute between Florsheim Stores and a C. I. O. union. This made the defendants’ objective unlawful and the dispute one other than a labor dispute. Orders unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.