Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942

Hyde v. Raduns

Hyde v. Raduns
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 7, 1942
263 A.D. 928; 32 N.Y.S.2d 617; 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7402
Hyde v. Raduns

Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. *929All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the authority of Moore v. Nye (21 N. Y. Supp. 94; 66 Hun, 628 [3d Dept.]; affd., 142 N. Y. 677); Umfreville v. Keeler (1 T. & C. 486 [4th Dept.]); Rich v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (87 N. Y. 382); Adams v. Gillig (199 id. 314); Ochs v. Woods (221 id. 335); Hobaica v. Byrne (216 App. Div. 307, 309), and Bowery National Bank v. Duncan (12 Hun, 405, 408). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover damage for alleged fraud and misrepresentation. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.