Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942

Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's Union, Local 1115-F

Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's Union, Local 1115-F
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 19, 1942
264 A.D. 375; 35 N.Y.S.2d 598; 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4154

Counsel

Leon Reich of counsel [Simon J. Liebowitz with him on the brief; Liebowitz & Schuman, attorneys], for the appellant-respondent., Samuel J. Robbins, for the respondent-appellant.

Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's Union, Local 1115-F

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The complaint alleges and the evidence establishes the existence of a labor dispute within the meaning of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act. The plaintiff’s failure to comply with the provisions of that section requires the reversal of the judgment and the dismissal of the complaint.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs to the defendant-appellant-respondent, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., and Dore, J., dissent.

*376Judgment reversed, with costs to the defendant-appellant-respondent, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Settle order on notice, reversing findings inconsistent with this determination, and containing such new findings of fact proved upon the trial as are necessary to sustain the judgment hereby awarded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.