Mateyka v. Reischmann

We interpret the interlocutory judgment to mean that on tli accounting plaintiff is entitled to one-third of the assets of the partnership afta crediting each partner with the amount of such partner’s capital contribution! As so interpreted, we think the judgment is correct.

The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.