Goldstein v. Wright
Goldstein v. Wright
264 A.D. 836; 35 N.Y.S.2d 753; 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4933
Opinion of the Court
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, without costs, and items 2 and 3 of the demand for a biE of particulars aEowed as modified herein: 2. An itemized statement of the services rendered by plaintiff to the copartnership of Wright & Sexton as aEeged in paragraph “ seventh ” of the complaint. 3. An itemized statement of services rendered by plaintiff to said George S. Simpson individually^ in contradistinction
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.