Keenan v. Martin
Keenan v. Martin
265 A.D. 981; 38 N.Y.S.2d 710; 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6813
Opinion of the Court
Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., concurs solely upon the ground that mandamus may not be resorted to in matters of this kind. The petitioner is entitled to a total of seventeen and one-half days per month as compensation and commutation. (People ex rel. Hammond v. Martin, 261 App. Div. 648.) [See post, p. 1029.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.