Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943

In re Sonderlick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 15, 1943

265 A.D. 394; 39 N.Y.S.2d 771; 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6307

Counsel

Louis Susmcm for petitioner., Jacob W. Friedman for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion to,confirm the report of the referee should be denied. In view, however, of the respondent’s inexperience, we think that a censure is sufficient punishment.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Glennon and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to confirm the report of the referee and to dismiss the proceeding.

Eespondent censured.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.